starvinbohemian: (Default)
starvinbohemian ([personal profile] starvinbohemian) wrote2010-02-04 12:14 am
Entry tags:

Oh, Annie Leibovitz and Vanity Fair... Really?

Oh, Annie Leibovitz. I know virtually nothing about you, but every time I turn around you're at the center of some controversy. Whether it's because you've done a ridiculously racist photo shoot or an inappropriate Lolitaesque portrait of a fifteen-year-old...

And now THIS. Granted, she did not write the article for Vanity Fair's List of This Year's Up and Coming Young Actresses. But she did shoot the pictures, and all racism issues aside, the picture is literally so white that I cannot see it! I'm not being facetious when I say that the combination of such pale actresses and pale dresses on a white background burns my eyes in a way akin to staring into a light bulb. I had to read the article to realize that I was already familiar with all but one of the featured actresses due to the fact that the actresses have had their (already) white faces whitewashed by Photoshop beyond the point of recognition.

But just in case I was in the mood to feel annoyed at something beyond the fact that I've been robbed of the eyesight necessary to view what I'm sure are lovely photos of my girlcrush, Amanda Seyfried-- HERE, HERE, and HERE are articles addressing the disturbing lack of diversity in the young women spotlighted as "up and coming" this year. My burned retinas stand in agreement that there are certain actresses of a, shall we say, darker pigment than those listed that are notable omissions, such as Zoe Saldana, Freida Pinto, and Gabourey Sidibe.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to blindly locate-- by way of feeling around what I hope is my medicine cabinet-- some eye drops.

I'm only saying this because I know way too much about Vanity Fair

[identity profile] einarrd686.livejournal.com 2010-02-04 08:56 am (UTC)(link)
Well, to be fair to Leibovitz, Zoe Saldana was featured in the 2008 Hollywood Up and Coming Issue, in a very similar tableaux, (albeit, similarly pale) which can be found here: http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/hollywood_covers_slideshow#slide=1

And to be fair to Vanity Fair, she got her own photo shoot in the August 2009 issue here: http://www.vanityfair.com/style/features/2009/09/zoe-saldana-portfolio200909#slide=1

That doesn't speak to the other omissions, I know, or that Gabourey Sidibe didn't make the cover. They could have tried a little harder. In fact, going over previous up an coming covers is rather like playing "find the minority actress they decided to let in this year". They could have let Cate Blachette sit out a few issues and let some new blood in.

Still, for all of Leibovitz's controversy, she's still a strong photographer.

Oh, and if you like Amanda Seyfried, you might like her recast in My Man Godfrey with Channing Tatum (http://www.vanityfair.com/style/features/2009/08/30S-fashion-portfolio200908#slide=11) even though in no universe ever could Channing Tatum replace William Powell. That's just dumb.

Re: I'm only saying this because I know way too much about Vanity Fair

[identity profile] starvinbohemian.livejournal.com 2010-02-04 09:32 am (UTC)(link)
I mean to say this in the most heterosexual way possible (meaning, not very), but damn that girl is fine. I think it would be impossible to make her look bad.

The problem with the argument that Zoe has already been featured is that Evan Rachel Wood, who did get put on the list, has been on the same list at least three times. Not just featured in the magazine, but on the same up and coming list. Kristen Stewart has also made the list previously. Kate Winslet was also listed three times. Plus, Cate Blanchett, etc. So, it's okay to give multiple bumps to white actresses, but the tokens only get to be tokens once? Ick.

Re: I'm only saying this because I know way too much about Vanity Fair

[identity profile] einarrd686.livejournal.com 2010-02-04 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
That seems to be the way they operate. Yeah, no lie, that's lame.

Re: I'm only saying this because I know way too much about Vanity Fair

[identity profile] arisingstarlet.livejournal.com 2010-02-04 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
WAIT!!!!!!!! Are they remaking My Man Godfrey?!?!?!? or is it just a fashion spread! I fear the answer!!!! If they remake that move i will punch them in the throat and make them watch all William Powell and Carol Lombard movies and then punch them in the throat again!!!!

Re: I'm only saying this because I know way too much about Vanity Fair

[identity profile] einarrd686.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
It's okay babe, it's all okay. Just a fashion spread. They "recast" depression era/themed films, pretty cleverly actually, (my favorite is The Grapes of Wrath, with Mama Joad played by a man).
http://www.vanityfair.com/style/features/2009/08/30S-fashion-portfolio200908#slide=1

[identity profile] arisingstarlet.livejournal.com 2010-02-04 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok, while i am not excusing her for her questionable taste, Anne is an artist. You don't have to like the art she produces, but its still art. Vanity fair doesn't have to run those things as the cover (unless they want publicity....which i am assuming they do). And its not liked she picked the actress's or anything. The white washness of the picture is actually a style vanity fair reproduces over and over in their spreads, and is a style of hers as well.

Also the whole whitewashed thing is as old as the fashion industry itself. I think its weird that people are just coming around to this. Its a well known fact that its harder for African American models to grace covers of magazines, Tyra aside.

[identity profile] starvinbohemian.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
The white-wash style hurts my eyes. What's the point of art if I can't see it?

Personally, I think an artist should balance their art with a certain sense of responsibility (i.e. taking into consideration if something is going to be racially offensive), but that's just opening us up to a long, college-style ethics argument. ;)

I don't think anyone is just coming around to this criticism, but I like the idea that people are finally getting called on the horrible things they do.

[identity profile] kuridee.livejournal.com 2010-02-04 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
On top of the all-white actresses, another thing that bothers me the most about this is that they're not all good actresses. Kristen Stewart got on the cover and Zoe Saldana, Freida Pinto, and Gabourey Sidibe didn't?

I mean seriously.

(Unless "The Runaways" kicks some major ass, I still cannot ever unsee KStew as Bella. Not even after "Speak" and "Zathura," which I saw prior to Twilight... D:)

[identity profile] starvinbohemian.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
Haha. See, I've avoided seeing any of the Twilight movies, so when I think of Kristen Stewart, I think of how awesome she is in her little Indie movies/roles. I'm a fan, but only because Bella Swan hasn't managed to taint my image of her.

But I get how you feel. :)

[identity profile] kaysa3.livejournal.com 2010-02-07 05:34 pm (UTC)(link)
...King Kong... yikes.
:/